<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Product Liability Insurance Blog &#187; intellectual property abatement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog/index.php/tag/intellectual-property-abatement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog</link>
	<description>Industry guru, Paul Owens, provides expert commentary and advice on product liability insurance and risk management.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Three Reasons Why Your Attorney May Discourage You From Purchasing Intellectual Property Abatement Insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/09/2-reasons-why-your-attorney-may-discourage-you-from-purchasing-intellectual-property-abatement-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/09/2-reasons-why-your-attorney-may-discourage-you-from-purchasing-intellectual-property-abatement-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property abatement coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many attorneys are looking out for the best interest of their clients and will recommend their client purchase Intellectual Property Abatement  coverage so their clients have the financial means to enforce their Intellectual Property rights or patents against infringers, it has &#8230; <a href="http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/09/2-reasons-why-your-attorney-may-discourage-you-from-purchasing-intellectual-property-abatement-insurance/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many attorneys are looking out for the best interest of their clients and will recommend their client purchase <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Intellectual Property Abatement</span></strong>  coverage so their clients have the financial means to enforce their <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Intellectual Property</span></strong> rights or <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">patents</span></strong> against infringers, it has been my experience many attorneys are quick to discourage their clients from purchasing this coverage. I believe there are three reasons why many attorneys will discourage their clients from purchasing <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Intellectual Property Abatement Insurance.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Intellectual Property Abatement Insurance</span></strong> covers litigation expenses incurred in enforcing the insured&#8217;s <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">intellectual property</span></strong> (IP) against infringers up to the limits of the policy.</p>
<p>First, one of the conditions of the policy requires that before you can prosecute an infringer that stole your <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">intellectual property</span></strong> or <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">patent</span></strong>, you must submit to the insurance carrier a favorable letter from outside <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">patent</span></strong> counsel (independent of the counsel you have chosen to litigate), at your cost, on matters of validity, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">infringement</span></strong> and legal impediments.  In other words, you must chose an unbiased attorney and present them with the facts of the case.  The unbiased attorney must provide a favorable opinion letter that your case is winnable based on all the facts.  </p>
<p>A second reason is when choosing an attorney to litigate against infringers your attorney 1)must be independent of the insured and 2) cannot have participated in the prosecuting or the securing of your Intellectual Property or Patent.</p>
<p>The third reason is, even if you current attorney passes the first two conditions or requirements, the insurance carrier requires that your attorney propose a reasonable budget for the work to be done to get you through a lawsuit.</p>
<p>In summary, the first two reasons above may exclude your attorney from being involved in the prosecution of <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">infringers</span></strong> of your <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Intellectual Property</span></strong>; therefore, denying them an opportunity to make money. If you attorney passes the first two conditions, the third reason may limit what your attorney can charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.products-liability-insurance.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/09/2-reasons-why-your-attorney-may-discourage-you-from-purchasing-intellectual-property-abatement-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

